We remove friction from Compliance.

From regulation to proof. Automatically.

Reducing cost, complexity, time to market and risk exposure - with deterministic AI reasoning, full traceability, and audit-grade outputs.

Request a Demo See How It Works
Abivian compliance platform interface
0 hrs
Not 4-6 months
0%+
Cost savings
0K+
Regulations mapped
0%
Traceability
All Jurisdictions
Scroll

The Problem

Compliance has become an impossible burden.

The regulations are real, the penalties are real, and the manual work is crushing teams. Here is what one case actually looks like.

Real Case · OFAC Sanctions

One customer.
One compliance area.

0
documents to process
Directives, laws, statutes, agency guidance
0
pages across 8 source types
Every page must be read and verified
0
statutes (USC) alone
Each requiring legal interpretation

Each dot is one page · AP Møller – Maersk · OFAC Sanctions

0
pages to read, analyse & verify

That's like reading War & Peace by Tolstoy 9.5 times.

↳ Maersk runs dozens of cases like this - simultaneously, across jurisdictions.

$0B
Global regulatory fines in 2025
+420% since 2014 · Record year
3–8%
Of operating budgets spent on compliance
100K+ regulations · ~15% change annually
0 mo
Average compliance delay per case
$1.2M avg cost per product launch delay

The Solution

Law in. Proof out.

Every verdict is traceable back to its source. Regulation to requirement to evidence to decision - automatically, deterministically, every time.

The Law
Requirement
Evidence
Verdict
Regulation
DORA Art. 9 - ICT security policies
"Financial entities shall implement ICT security policies, procedures and tools to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data."
Requirement
Access control policies must restrict ICT systems to authorised personnel only
Extracted from Art. 9 §4(b) - applies to all ICT systems in scope of DORA
Evidence
ICT Security Framework v2.1 - §3.4 Access Management
"Role-based access enforced across all production systems. MFA required. Access reviewed quarterly. Last review: Jan 2026."
Verdict
Requirement satisfied - evidence verified and sourced
Full traceability from regulation to evidence. ISO 19011-aligned audit trail generated.
MET
- second requirement, same case -
Regulation
DORA Art. 17 - ICT-related incident management
"Financial entities shall define, establish and implement an ICT-related incident management process to detect, manage and notify ICT-related incidents."
Requirement
Major incidents must be reported to competent authority within 4 hours
Mandatory under DORA RTS - initial notification within 4 hours of classification as major
Evidence
Incident Response Procedure v2.0 - §5.3 Reporting Timelines
"Major incidents to be reported within 24 hours..." - does not meet DORA's 4-hour initial notification requirement.
Verdict
Gap identified - remediation required before audit
Remediation plan generated. Owner assigned. Penalty exposure calculated. Linked to audit trail.
NOT MET
What you get Complete audit-ready outputs, automatically
Discover
Regulatory Graph
Regulatory Posture
Obligations Extraction
Standards Identification
Verify
Compliance Adherence Check
Controls & Verification API
Verbatim Traceability
Evidence Registry
Act
Gap Analysis
Risk Assessment
Penalties Exposure
Remediation & Actions
Compliance Workflows
Sustain
Audit Trail
Monitoring & Change Alerts
Query your Case
Integrations & Exports

Live Example · US OFAC Sanctions

See the regulatory graph in action

This is a real output from Abivian - the complete US OFAC sanctions for two States regulatory landscape, mapped automatically.

Click and drag nodes to explore. Click any node for details. Scroll to zoom.

One Platform · All Regulations

Built for regulatory breadth.
What's on your radar?

From financial compliance to AI governance to sustainability - one deterministic engine covers the full regulatory landscape.

Abivian
ALL
Frameworks
ALL
Domains
1
Engine
0%
Friction

The Platform

End-to-end compliance resolution.

From a blank case to a regulator-ready audit trail - every step is deterministic, traceable, and connected.

Act 1 Map the landscape - understand exactly what applies to you
01
Case Setup
Define product, jurisdiction, scope. Upload documentation. Abivian structures content and flags contradictions before reasoning begins.
Structured case context
02
Regulatory Discovery
Automatically identify every applicable regulation - directives, statutes, case law, agency guidance - verified from authoritative sources across all jurisdictions.
Living regulatory graph
03
Regulatory Taxonomy
Map the full hierarchy - EU directive chains, US federal structures, national transpositions - resolved independently per jurisdiction with cross-references intact.
Regulatory taxonomy map
landscape mapped - now assess your position
Act 2 Assess compliance - determine where you stand and close the gaps
04
Requirements Extraction
Extract every obligation from hundreds of regulations. Clustered into thematic groups so your team navigates what matters - without drowning in volume.
Obligations registry
05
Resolution & Verification
Triangulate context, regulations, and standards. Every requirement resolved to MET or NOT MET - with verbatim regulatory text, sourced evidence, and full traceability.
MET / NOT MET verdicts
06
Remediation
Every NOT MET becomes a governed action. Prioritised by risk score and penalty exposure. Owners, deadlines, and residual risk tracked to closure.
Governed remediation plan
compliance assessed - now govern it continuously
Act 3 Govern continuously - stay audit-ready as the regulatory world changes
07
Controls & Risk
Atomised controls derived from your regulatory graph. Each linked to compounded risk scores, penalty exposure, and detection probability - continuously testable.
Risk-linked control set
08
Audit Trail
ISO 19011-aligned. Every decision, source, and evidence link documented. Complete traceability from regulation to resolution - ready for regulators on demand.
Audit-grade trail
09
Continuous Monitoring
Real-time watch on every regulation in your graph. Changes, amendments, new requirements - caught and assessed before they impact your compliance posture.
Verified change reports
10
Query & Export
Ask questions directly against your case. Export to audit packages, reports, and integration APIs. Your compliance intelligence, in the format you need.
Reports & integrations
What you get Every output is sourced, traceable, and audit-ready
Discover
Regulatory Graph
Regulatory Posture
Obligations Extraction
Standards Identification
Verify
Compliance Adherence Check
Controls & Verification API
Verbatim Traceability
Evidence Registry
Act
Gap Analysis
Risk Assessment
Penalties Exposure
Remediation & Actions
Compliance Workflows
Sustain
Audit Trail
Monitoring & Change Alerts
Query your Case
Integrations & Exports

What they said when they saw it

Reactions from the Moment it Clicked

Why It's Different

The problem isn't hallucinations. It's the architecture.

Hallucinations are the symptom everyone talks about. But the real failure runs deeper - and it compounds with every page of regulatory text you add.

01
Hallucinations - the invisible kind
Ask an LLM a simple, distinct question and it performs well. The problem is barely noticeable. But feed it thousands of pages of regulatory text - all written in the same formal register, the same clause patterns, the same cross-reference style - and the model begins to silently blend what it read with what it statistically predicts.

It doesn't invent things from nothing. It conflates real provisions from different regulations. GDPR Art. 32 and DORA Art. 9 both use nearly identical language about "appropriate technical measures." The output looks correct. The article numbers are real. The reasoning sounds right. The jurisdiction is wrong.
Simple Q&A
Low
Mixed documents
Growing
100s of regulations
Critical
The more your context resembles itself - like regulatory text - the more the model confabulates with total confidence.
02
Sub-optimal outputs
Probable ≠ correct for your company. LLMs produce the most likely interpretation across their entire training corpus - answers optimised for the average company, not yours.

The right interpretation of DORA Art. 9 for a Tier 1 bank with legacy infrastructure is completely different from a cloud-native fintech. The model doesn't know the difference. It answers for the statistical middle - and the statistical middle fails your specific audit.
A correct-sounding answer built for no one in particular fails every audit that matters to you specifically.
03
Context rot
More context makes every problem worse. As input grows, relevant provisions become statistically insignificant against millions of distractor tokens. Research confirms performance degrades even when the model can perfectly retrieve the right evidence - the surrounding noise actively interferes with reasoning.
Short context~94% accuracy
One framework (~10MB)~76% accuracy
Enterprise compliance (~80MB)<50% accuracy
The bigger the case, the worse the AI. You pay more for results that are less reliable.
The agent myth
"Just use AI agents" doesn't solve this. It multiplies it.
Agents appear to solve reasoning and context problems by breaking tasks into steps. They don't. They layer orchestration complexity on top of a probabilistic foundation - making failures slower to detect, harder to trace, and impossible to present to a regulator.
Errors compound across steps
A wrong assumption at step 2 becomes immutable context at step 3. By step 10 you have a confident, coherent - and wrong - compliance assessment. No agent catches its own drift mid-chain.
Agents succeed ~50% of the time in production (2025 research)
No traceability across the chain
When a verdict is wrong, you cannot trace which step failed or why. In compliance, an untraceable output cannot be presented to a regulator, an auditor, or a board.
Courts have yet to rule on liability for autonomous agent errors (2026)
Probabilistic foundation, probabilistic ceiling
Agents built on LLMs inherit all three failure modes above. Orchestrating probabilistic steps doesn't make them deterministic - it gives failure more places to silently activate.
One generic interpretation at step 1 corrupts every downstream conclusion
What Abivian actually does - one company, one framework, one jurisdiction
10K+
equivalent ChatGPT prompts worth of reasoning per case
~12 hrs
parallel computation - what used to take 4–6 months manually
1000s
of verified reasoning steps, each earned before the next begins
Abivian doesn't send a prompt and wait for an answer. It runs a structured reasoning process - simulating, deducing, contradicting its own findings, and synthesising - until every conclusion is traceable to its source. This is what audit-grade means.
How Abivian is built differently Each pillar directly addresses one failure mode above
PILLAR 01
Preemptive ambiguity trap detection
Before any reasoning begins, Abivian scans for the specific failure modes that cause probabilistic systems to silently go wrong in regulatory text. If they cannot be resolved, the system halts rather than guessing.
↳ Addresses: invisible hallucinations
PILLAR 02
Iterative reasoning engine
Abivian doesn't generate a single response. It actively thinks - simulating, deducing, challenging its own findings, and building a verified chain of evidence before committing. Every step earns the next.
↳ Addresses: sub-optimal outputs
PILLAR 03
Knowledge distillation
Regulatory frameworks compressed into structured knowledge hierarchies - not summaries - preserving every definition, threshold, and cross-reference at full fidelity within manageable reasoning budgets.
↳ Addresses: context rot
PILLAR 04
Semantic document intelligence
Every provision retrievable, contextualised, and connected to the regulatory structure it belongs to. Complete coverage is guaranteed - no provision falls between processing boundaries.
↳ Addresses: agent & RAG failures

"The compliance industry doesn't need more powerful language models. It needs AI that is architecturally incapable of guessing."

Controls & Risk

Every requirement becomes a testable control.

Abivian derives atomized controls from your regulatory posture and evaluates your operational data against them. Each control is linked to its regulatory source - and to what happens when it fails.

1

Send

Operational data - code, logs, descriptions, contracts, policies

2

Verify

Controls derived from your regulatory posture evaluate every item

3

Act

PASS or NOT PASS - failures linked to penalties, sanctions, and risk exposure

Controls Methodology

Derived from the regulatory graph, case context, extracted requirements, and regulatory consequences - creating atomized Controls that are self-contained and testable.

Self-contained & Testable

Controls Linked to Risk

Every Control inherits base risk from its regulatory source, then undergoes contextual risk assessment - compounded scores, gap analysis, detection probability, and multi-dimensional impact.

Compounded Risk Scoring

Controls API

Continuously send operational data to verify against controls. Failures are immediately flagged with priority - transforming static compliance into a living, continuously updated posture.

Continuous Verification

ROI & Impact

Measurable results from day one

Abivian doesn't just automate compliance - it transforms how your team spends time, money, and attention.

0%

Faster Time to Compliance

What used to take 2–4 months of manual work is completed in 12–24 hours. Your team moves from reactive to proactive.

0%+

Reduction in Compliance Cost

Less manual research, fewer external consultants, and no redundant work across jurisdictions. Budget freed for strategic priorities.

0%

Audit Traceability

Every requirement mapped to source with page-level citations. No gaps, no guesswork - ready for regulators on demand.

Eliminate compliance bottlenecks

Product launches delayed by regulatory reviews? Abivian runs full compliance assessments in parallel - removing the 6-month delays that stall go-to-market.

Free your experts for high-value work

Stop spending senior talent on manual document review. Abivian handles the heavy lifting so your compliance team focuses on judgment, strategy, and stakeholder engagement.

Reduce regulatory risk exposure

Continuous monitoring catches regulatory changes before they become violations. No more discovering gaps during audits - Abivian finds them first.

Get Started

See Abivian in action

Leave your details and we'll reach out to schedule a personalized demo.

Your information is kept private. No spam, ever.

Thank you - we'll be in touch.

We've received your request and will reach out within one business day to schedule your demo.

‹ 60 sec brief
60-second briefing
One platform. Every regulation. Start to audit.
The 60-second version - because your time is exactly what we're here to protect.
One customer. One compliance area. That's 11,590 pages - like reading War & Peace nine and a half times. Abivian processes it in 12 hours.
The problem
Every market you operate in adds regulations. GDPR, DORA, NIS2, SOX, OFAC - each one is hundreds of documents and thousands of obligations. Managing this manually doesn't scale.
What we do
We handle compliance end-to-end - discovery, assessment, gap analysis, remediation, controls, audit trail - for any framework, any jurisdiction, automatically.
Why it's different
Deterministic AI, not probabilistic guessing. Every verdict is sourced. Every decision is traceable. The output stands up to regulators.
Request a Demo Show me how a case works →